Files

382 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# XIC v1.5 Symbolic Pipeline Extension Report
**Date**: 2026-05-21
**Status**: ✅ Complete and validated
**Scope**: Symbolic pipeline abstraction + glyph-aware transformations + formal semantics
---
## Executive Summary
Extended XIC v1 to v1.5 with:
1. **Symbolic Pipeline Abstraction** (`glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`)
- Explicit pipeline with step tracking
- Data structures: SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult
- Function: `run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id)`
2. **Glyph-Aware Transformations**
- CALL_GLYPH now routes through pipeline with explicit glyph_id
- Context includes glyph metadata for LAIN kernel
- Fused symbols captured in results
3. **Formal Semantics Specification** (`XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md`)
- Complete instruction semantics for all 9 ops
- Preconditions, postconditions, side effects
- Context model and pipeline flow
- Backward compatibility guarantees
**Zero breaking changes**. All XIC v1 programs work unchanged.
---
## Phase 1: Symbolic Pipeline Abstraction
### File: `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`
#### Data Structures
```python
@dataclass
class SymbolicStep:
name: str # e.g., "initial_prompt", "glyph:xyz", "fusion"
kind: str # "prompt", "glyph_call", "fused_symbol"
payload: Any # Step data
context: Dict[str, Any] # Context at this step
@dataclass
class SymbolicPipelineResult:
steps: List[SymbolicStep] # Execution steps taken
output_text: str # Final text output
fused_symbol: Optional[Dict] # Fused symbolic representation
```
#### Core Function
```python
def run_symbolic_pipeline(
prompt: str,
context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
glyph_id: Optional[str] = None,
) -> SymbolicPipelineResult
```
**Behavior**:
1. Creates SymbolicStep for initial_prompt
2. If glyph_id: adds glyph_id to context, creates glyph_call step
3. Compresses prompt → GSZ3
4. Builds minimal manifest/segments
5. Calls `CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic(manifest, segments, payload, mode="symbolic", context=...)`
6. Extracts output_text and fused_symbol
7. If fused_symbol: creates fusion step
8. Returns SymbolicPipelineResult
**Integration with Cognitive Kernel**:
- Uses existing `CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic()` API
- Wraps it with step tracking and glyph-aware routing
- No circular imports (lazy import in glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py)
---
## Phase 2: Glyph-Aware Transformations
### Integration Points
#### 1. RUN_PROMPT
```python
def op_RUN_PROMPT(ctx, *args):
if ctx.symbolic_mode:
pipeline_result = run_symbolic_pipeline(
prompt=prompt,
context=ctx.params.get("context")
)
ctx._state["last_symbolic_pipeline"] = pipeline_result
```
**Stores**:
- `last_symbolic_result`: output_text string
- `last_symbolic_pipeline`: full SymbolicPipelineResult
#### 2. STREAM
Same routing as RUN_PROMPT, but streams output line-by-line.
#### 3. CALL_GLYPH
```python
def op_CALL_GLYPH(ctx, *args):
glyph_id = str(args[0])
payload = str(args[1]) if len(args) > 1 else ""
glyph_context = dict(ctx.params.get("context", {}))
glyph_context["glyph_id"] = glyph_id
pipeline_result = run_symbolic_pipeline(
prompt=payload,
context=glyph_context,
glyph_id=glyph_id,
)
ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}"] = {
"output_text": pipeline_result.output_text,
"fused_symbol": pipeline_result.fused_symbol,
"steps": [step metadata...]
}
```
**Stores**:
- Key: `glyph_{glyph_id}`
- Value: Dict with output_text, fused_symbol, steps
### Context Propagation
```
SET_CONTEXT "domain" "glyph_cognition"
SET_CONTEXT "style" "analytic"
CALL_GLYPH "glyph://compression" "prompt..."
context = {"domain": "glyph_cognition", "style": "analytic", "glyph_id": "glyph://compression"}
run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id)
LAIN kernel processes with glyph-aware context
```
---
## Phase 3: XIC Instruction Semantics v1.5
### File: `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md`
Comprehensive formal specification covering:
1. **Overview**: Dual execution modes (compressed/symbolic), architecture
2. **XICContext model**: Field definitions, context propagation
3. **Instruction semantics**: All 9 ops with:
- Signature (JSON form)
- Preconditions
- Postconditions
- Side effects
- Symbolic vs compressed behavior
4. **Symbolic pipeline semantics**: run_symbolic_pipeline, SymbolicPipelineResult, SymbolicStep
5. **Execution paths**: Compressed and symbolic flowcharts
6. **Context flow**: Example of glyph-aware cognition
7. **Backward compatibility**: v1 → v1.5 changes
### Key Changes from v1
| Aspect | v1 | v1.5 |
|--------|----|----|
| Pipeline implementation | Inline in run_symbolic_prompt | Separate glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py |
| Glyph support | Manual context manipulation | Explicit glyph_id parameter |
| Step tracking | None | Full SymbolicStep list |
| Result structure | String only | SymbolicPipelineResult (steps + fused_symbol) |
| Formal spec | Docstrings | XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md |
---
## Phase 4: Demo Program and Validation
### Demo Program: `programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json`
```json
{
"instructions": [
{ "op": "SET_MODE", "args": ["symbolic"] },
{ "op": "SET_CONTEXT", "args": ["domain", "glyph_cognition"] },
{ "op": "SET_CONTEXT", "args": ["style", "analytic"] },
{ "op": "CHAIN", "args": ["glyph_analysis"] },
{ "op": "LOG", "args": ["Starting glyph-aware symbolic pipeline"] },
{ "op": "CALL_GLYPH", "args": ["glyph://compression", "..."] },
{ "op": "RUN_PROMPT", "args": ["..."] }
]
}
```
### Validation Results (7/7 Tests Passed)
✅ Symbolic pipeline module imports
✅ run_symbolic_pipeline() execution
✅ Glyph-aware pipeline (glyph_id parameter)
✅ Demo symbolic pipeline program
✅ CALL_GLYPH result storage (output_text, fused_symbol, steps)
✅ Backward compatibility (demo_chat.gx.json)
✅ run_symbolic_prompt() wrapper works
---
## Architecture
### Module Hierarchy
```
glyphos/
├── cognitive_kernel.py (CognitiveKernel, get_kernel, run_symbolic_prompt wrapper)
├── symbolic_pipeline.py (SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult, run_symbolic_pipeline)
├── events.py (EventBus, emit, on)
└── __init__.py (exports all)
xic_ops.py
└── Uses: run_symbolic_pipeline (lazy import inside ops)
└── RUN_PROMPT, STREAM, CALL_GLYPH route through pipeline
```
### Data Flow (Symbolic Mode)
```
XIC Program
RUN_PROMPT / STREAM / CALL_GLYPH
run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id)
[Step 1] Initial prompt
[Step 2] Glyph call (if glyph_id present)
[Step 3] Compress + build manifest
[Step 4] CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic()
[Step 5] LAIN 8-lane cognition
[Step 6] Fusion step (if fused_symbol present)
SymbolicPipelineResult
├── steps: [...SymbolicStep...]
├── output_text: str
└── fused_symbol: Dict | None
Store in ctx._state
```
---
## Backward Compatibility
**XIC v1 programs work unchanged**:
- demo_chat.gx.json executes identically
- execute_gx() behavior preserved
- Compressed mode execution path unchanged
**run_symbolic_prompt() thin wrapper**:
- Existing code importing run_symbolic_prompt() still works
- Now routes through pipeline (transparent upgrade)
**No binary format changes**:
- .gx files unchanged
- JSON manifest format unchanged
- GXIC1 magic and version unchanged
---
## Files Modified or Created
### Created
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py | Symbolic pipeline abstraction |
| XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md | Formal instruction semantics spec |
| programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json | Demo of glyph-aware pipeline |
### Modified
| File | Changes |
|------|---------|
| glyphos/__init__.py | +export SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult, run_symbolic_pipeline |
| glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py | run_symbolic_prompt() → thin wrapper around pipeline |
| xic_ops.py | op_RUN_PROMPT, op_STREAM, op_CALL_GLYPH → use pipeline |
### Unchanged (Backward Compatibility)
- xic_loader.py
- xic_vm.py
- xic_executor.py
- runtime_executor/runner.py
- All .gx binary files
---
## Key Design Decisions
### 1. Separate Pipeline Module (symbolic_pipeline.py)
**Rationale**: Makes pipeline structure explicit and testable. Enables step tracking without modifying core kernel.
### 2. SymbolicPipelineResult with Steps
**Rationale**: Supports introspection, debugging, and future enhancements (e.g., step replay, conditional routing).
### 3. Explicit glyph_id Parameter
**Rationale**: Makes glyph-aware cognition intentional and traceable. Simplifies context propagation.
### 4. Formal Semantics Specification
**Rationale**: Documents contract clearly for tool builders, enables static analysis, serves as implementation guide.
---
## Usage Examples
### Example 1: Symbolic Mode with Context
```bash
glyph --xic -c "
SET_MODE symbolic
SET_CONTEXT domain compression_theory
SET_CONTEXT style analytical
RUN_PROMPT 'Explain lossy compression as a glyph.'
"
```
### Example 2: Glyph-Aware Cognition
```bash
glyph --xic programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json
```
Results in:
- `ctx._state["glyph_glyph://compression"]` with output_text, fused_symbol, steps
- Full execution trace via SymbolicPipelineResult
---
## Testing
All validation tests pass:
```
[TEST 1] Symbolic pipeline module imports ✅
[TEST 2] run_symbolic_pipeline() execution ✅
[TEST 3] Glyph-aware pipeline (glyph_id parameter) ✅
[TEST 4] Demo symbolic pipeline program ✅
[TEST 5] CALL_GLYPH result storage ✅
[TEST 6] Backward compatibility ✅
[TEST 7] run_symbolic_prompt() wrapper ✅
```
---
## References
- **Formal Specification**: See `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md` for complete instruction semantics
- **Previous Reports**: `XIC_SYMBOLIC_EXTENSION_REPORT.md` documents symbolic mode v1
- **Cognitive Kernel**: `glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py` (CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic API)
---
## Summary
XIC v1.5 extends the v1 engine with:
- Explicit symbolic pipeline abstraction
- Glyph-aware transformations with context propagation
- Formal instruction semantics specification
- Full backward compatibility
**No breaking changes**. All XIC v1 programs continue to work unchanged.
---
**Implementation Complete**
**All tests passing**
**Backward compatible**
**Formal semantics documented**