# XIC v1.5 Symbolic Pipeline Extension Report **Date**: 2026-05-21 **Status**: ✅ Complete and validated **Scope**: Symbolic pipeline abstraction + glyph-aware transformations + formal semantics --- ## Executive Summary Extended XIC v1 to v1.5 with: 1. **Symbolic Pipeline Abstraction** (`glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`) - Explicit pipeline with step tracking - Data structures: SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult - Function: `run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id)` 2. **Glyph-Aware Transformations** - CALL_GLYPH now routes through pipeline with explicit glyph_id - Context includes glyph metadata for LAIN kernel - Fused symbols captured in results 3. **Formal Semantics Specification** (`XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md`) - Complete instruction semantics for all 9 ops - Preconditions, postconditions, side effects - Context model and pipeline flow - Backward compatibility guarantees **Zero breaking changes**. All XIC v1 programs work unchanged. --- ## Phase 1: Symbolic Pipeline Abstraction ### File: `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py` #### Data Structures ```python @dataclass class SymbolicStep: name: str # e.g., "initial_prompt", "glyph:xyz", "fusion" kind: str # "prompt", "glyph_call", "fused_symbol" payload: Any # Step data context: Dict[str, Any] # Context at this step @dataclass class SymbolicPipelineResult: steps: List[SymbolicStep] # Execution steps taken output_text: str # Final text output fused_symbol: Optional[Dict] # Fused symbolic representation ``` #### Core Function ```python def run_symbolic_pipeline( prompt: str, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None, glyph_id: Optional[str] = None, ) -> SymbolicPipelineResult ``` **Behavior**: 1. Creates SymbolicStep for initial_prompt 2. If glyph_id: adds glyph_id to context, creates glyph_call step 3. Compresses prompt → GSZ3 4. Builds minimal manifest/segments 5. Calls `CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic(manifest, segments, payload, mode="symbolic", context=...)` 6. Extracts output_text and fused_symbol 7. If fused_symbol: creates fusion step 8. Returns SymbolicPipelineResult **Integration with Cognitive Kernel**: - Uses existing `CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic()` API - Wraps it with step tracking and glyph-aware routing - No circular imports (lazy import in glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py) --- ## Phase 2: Glyph-Aware Transformations ### Integration Points #### 1. RUN_PROMPT ```python def op_RUN_PROMPT(ctx, *args): if ctx.symbolic_mode: pipeline_result = run_symbolic_pipeline( prompt=prompt, context=ctx.params.get("context") ) ctx._state["last_symbolic_pipeline"] = pipeline_result ``` **Stores**: - `last_symbolic_result`: output_text string - `last_symbolic_pipeline`: full SymbolicPipelineResult #### 2. STREAM Same routing as RUN_PROMPT, but streams output line-by-line. #### 3. CALL_GLYPH ```python def op_CALL_GLYPH(ctx, *args): glyph_id = str(args[0]) payload = str(args[1]) if len(args) > 1 else "" glyph_context = dict(ctx.params.get("context", {})) glyph_context["glyph_id"] = glyph_id pipeline_result = run_symbolic_pipeline( prompt=payload, context=glyph_context, glyph_id=glyph_id, ) ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}"] = { "output_text": pipeline_result.output_text, "fused_symbol": pipeline_result.fused_symbol, "steps": [step metadata...] } ``` **Stores**: - Key: `glyph_{glyph_id}` - Value: Dict with output_text, fused_symbol, steps ### Context Propagation ``` SET_CONTEXT "domain" "glyph_cognition" SET_CONTEXT "style" "analytic" CALL_GLYPH "glyph://compression" "prompt..." ↓ context = {"domain": "glyph_cognition", "style": "analytic", "glyph_id": "glyph://compression"} ↓ run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id) ↓ LAIN kernel processes with glyph-aware context ``` --- ## Phase 3: XIC Instruction Semantics v1.5 ### File: `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md` Comprehensive formal specification covering: 1. **Overview**: Dual execution modes (compressed/symbolic), architecture 2. **XICContext model**: Field definitions, context propagation 3. **Instruction semantics**: All 9 ops with: - Signature (JSON form) - Preconditions - Postconditions - Side effects - Symbolic vs compressed behavior 4. **Symbolic pipeline semantics**: run_symbolic_pipeline, SymbolicPipelineResult, SymbolicStep 5. **Execution paths**: Compressed and symbolic flowcharts 6. **Context flow**: Example of glyph-aware cognition 7. **Backward compatibility**: v1 → v1.5 changes ### Key Changes from v1 | Aspect | v1 | v1.5 | |--------|----|----| | Pipeline implementation | Inline in run_symbolic_prompt | Separate glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py | | Glyph support | Manual context manipulation | Explicit glyph_id parameter | | Step tracking | None | Full SymbolicStep list | | Result structure | String only | SymbolicPipelineResult (steps + fused_symbol) | | Formal spec | Docstrings | XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md | --- ## Phase 4: Demo Program and Validation ### Demo Program: `programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json` ```json { "instructions": [ { "op": "SET_MODE", "args": ["symbolic"] }, { "op": "SET_CONTEXT", "args": ["domain", "glyph_cognition"] }, { "op": "SET_CONTEXT", "args": ["style", "analytic"] }, { "op": "CHAIN", "args": ["glyph_analysis"] }, { "op": "LOG", "args": ["Starting glyph-aware symbolic pipeline"] }, { "op": "CALL_GLYPH", "args": ["glyph://compression", "..."] }, { "op": "RUN_PROMPT", "args": ["..."] } ] } ``` ### Validation Results (7/7 Tests Passed) ✅ Symbolic pipeline module imports ✅ run_symbolic_pipeline() execution ✅ Glyph-aware pipeline (glyph_id parameter) ✅ Demo symbolic pipeline program ✅ CALL_GLYPH result storage (output_text, fused_symbol, steps) ✅ Backward compatibility (demo_chat.gx.json) ✅ run_symbolic_prompt() wrapper works --- ## Architecture ### Module Hierarchy ``` glyphos/ ├── cognitive_kernel.py (CognitiveKernel, get_kernel, run_symbolic_prompt wrapper) ├── symbolic_pipeline.py (SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult, run_symbolic_pipeline) ├── events.py (EventBus, emit, on) └── __init__.py (exports all) xic_ops.py └── Uses: run_symbolic_pipeline (lazy import inside ops) └── RUN_PROMPT, STREAM, CALL_GLYPH route through pipeline ``` ### Data Flow (Symbolic Mode) ``` XIC Program ↓ RUN_PROMPT / STREAM / CALL_GLYPH ↓ run_symbolic_pipeline(prompt, context, glyph_id) ↓ [Step 1] Initial prompt [Step 2] Glyph call (if glyph_id present) [Step 3] Compress + build manifest [Step 4] CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic() [Step 5] LAIN 8-lane cognition [Step 6] Fusion step (if fused_symbol present) ↓ SymbolicPipelineResult ├── steps: [...SymbolicStep...] ├── output_text: str └── fused_symbol: Dict | None ↓ Store in ctx._state ``` --- ## Backward Compatibility ✅ **XIC v1 programs work unchanged**: - demo_chat.gx.json executes identically - execute_gx() behavior preserved - Compressed mode execution path unchanged ✅ **run_symbolic_prompt() thin wrapper**: - Existing code importing run_symbolic_prompt() still works - Now routes through pipeline (transparent upgrade) ✅ **No binary format changes**: - .gx files unchanged - JSON manifest format unchanged - GXIC1 magic and version unchanged --- ## Files Modified or Created ### Created | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py | Symbolic pipeline abstraction | | XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md | Formal instruction semantics spec | | programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json | Demo of glyph-aware pipeline | ### Modified | File | Changes | |------|---------| | glyphos/__init__.py | +export SymbolicStep, SymbolicPipelineResult, run_symbolic_pipeline | | glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py | run_symbolic_prompt() → thin wrapper around pipeline | | xic_ops.py | op_RUN_PROMPT, op_STREAM, op_CALL_GLYPH → use pipeline | ### Unchanged (Backward Compatibility) - xic_loader.py - xic_vm.py - xic_executor.py - runtime_executor/runner.py - All .gx binary files --- ## Key Design Decisions ### 1. Separate Pipeline Module (symbolic_pipeline.py) **Rationale**: Makes pipeline structure explicit and testable. Enables step tracking without modifying core kernel. ### 2. SymbolicPipelineResult with Steps **Rationale**: Supports introspection, debugging, and future enhancements (e.g., step replay, conditional routing). ### 3. Explicit glyph_id Parameter **Rationale**: Makes glyph-aware cognition intentional and traceable. Simplifies context propagation. ### 4. Formal Semantics Specification **Rationale**: Documents contract clearly for tool builders, enables static analysis, serves as implementation guide. --- ## Usage Examples ### Example 1: Symbolic Mode with Context ```bash glyph --xic -c " SET_MODE symbolic SET_CONTEXT domain compression_theory SET_CONTEXT style analytical RUN_PROMPT 'Explain lossy compression as a glyph.' " ``` ### Example 2: Glyph-Aware Cognition ```bash glyph --xic programs/demo_symbolic_pipeline.gx.json ``` Results in: - `ctx._state["glyph_glyph://compression"]` with output_text, fused_symbol, steps - Full execution trace via SymbolicPipelineResult --- ## Testing All validation tests pass: ``` [TEST 1] Symbolic pipeline module imports ✅ [TEST 2] run_symbolic_pipeline() execution ✅ [TEST 3] Glyph-aware pipeline (glyph_id parameter) ✅ [TEST 4] Demo symbolic pipeline program ✅ [TEST 5] CALL_GLYPH result storage ✅ [TEST 6] Backward compatibility ✅ [TEST 7] run_symbolic_prompt() wrapper ✅ ``` --- ## References - **Formal Specification**: See `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md` for complete instruction semantics - **Previous Reports**: `XIC_SYMBOLIC_EXTENSION_REPORT.md` documents symbolic mode v1 - **Cognitive Kernel**: `glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py` (CognitiveKernel.execute_symbolic API) --- ## Summary XIC v1.5 extends the v1 engine with: - Explicit symbolic pipeline abstraction - Glyph-aware transformations with context propagation - Formal instruction semantics specification - Full backward compatibility **No breaking changes**. All XIC v1 programs continue to work unchanged. --- **Implementation Complete** ✅ **All tests passing** ✅ **Backward compatible** ✅ **Formal semantics documented** ✅