Files
2125_GCE/XIC_GLYPH_RESONANCE_REPORT.md
T
2026-07-09 12:54:44 -04:00

657 lines
18 KiB
Markdown
Executable File

# XIC v1.5 Glyph Resonance Awareness Upgrade Report
**Date**: 2026-05-21
**Status**: ✅ Complete and validated
**Scope**: Enhanced glyph resonance tracking with comprehensive metric extraction and querying
---
## Executive Summary
Extended XIC v1.5 with comprehensive glyph resonance awareness:
1. **Enhanced Data Structures** (`glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`)
- New `GlyphResonanceMetrics` dataclass: weight, lineage_score, contributor_score, frequency_score, grammar_score
- Enhanced `GlyphResonanceMap` with utility methods for querying and aggregation
- Updated `FusedSymbol` with full resonance metric support
2. **Glyph Resonance Utilities**
- `extract_glyph_resonances(pipeline_result)` → extract per-glyph metrics
- `get_dominant_glyphs(pipeline_result, n=3)` → rank glyphs by weight
- `format_glyph_resonance_report(pipeline_result)` → human-readable reports
3. **Enhanced CALL_GLYPH Operation** (`xic_ops.py`)
- Now extracts and stores comprehensive resonance data
- Captures full SymbolicPipelineResult for direct access
- Stores resonance_metrics dict, global_resonance_score, and execution steps
4. **New GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE Instruction** (`xic_ops.py`)
- Query stored glyph resonance metrics with flexible metric selection
- Supports: report, global, dominant, weight, lineage, contributor, frequency, grammar
- Results stored for programmatic access
5. **Demo Program** (`programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json`)
- Two-chain analysis demonstrating resonance metric queries
- Covers all metric types: report, global, dominant, specific metrics
6. **Updated Formal Specification** (`XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md`)
- Added FusedSymbol structure documentation with example JSON
- Documented GlyphResonanceMetrics and GlyphResonanceMap
- Added GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE instruction semantics
- Clarified glyph resonance data access patterns
**Zero breaking changes**. All XIC v1 and v1.5 programs continue to work unchanged.
---
## Phase 1: Enhanced Data Structures
### File: `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`
#### New Dataclasses
**GlyphResonanceMetrics**
```python
@dataclass
class GlyphResonanceMetrics:
weight: float # Relative importance [0.0, 1.0]
lineage_score: float # Symbolic ancestry [0.0, 1.0]
contributor_score: float # Contribution to fusion [0.0, 1.0]
frequency_score: float # Occurrence frequency [0.0, 1.0]
grammar_score: float # Structural alignment [0.0, 1.0]
```
**GlyphResonanceMap** (Enhanced)
```python
@dataclass
class GlyphResonanceMap:
resonances: Dict[str, GlyphResonanceMetrics]
global_resonance_score: float
# New methods:
def get_glyph_resonance(self, glyph_id: str) Optional[GlyphResonanceMetrics]
def get_top_glyphs(self, n: int = 5) List[tuple[str, GlyphResonanceMetrics]]
def get_average_resonance(self) float
```
**FusedSymbol** (Updated)
```python
@dataclass
class FusedSymbol:
summary: str
glyph_ids: List[str]
resonance_map: GlyphResonanceMap = field(default_factory=GlyphResonanceMap)
@classmethod
def from_lain_result(cls, lain_fused_symbol: Dict[str, Any]) "FusedSymbol"
```
#### Parsing LAIN Output
`FusedSymbol.from_lain_result()` parses LAIN cognition output:
```python
lain_result = {
"summary": "...",
"glyph_ids": [...],
"global_resonance_score": 0.847,
"resonance_map": {
"glyph_id": {
"weight": 0.95,
"lineage_score": 0.82,
...
}
}
}
fused_symbol = FusedSymbol.from_lain_result(lain_result)
```
---
## Phase 2: Glyph Resonance Utilities
### File: `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`
#### extract_glyph_resonances()
```python
def extract_glyph_resonances(
pipeline_result: "SymbolicPipelineResult",
) Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]
```
**Behavior**: Extracts per-glyph metrics from pipeline result.
**Returns**:
```python
{
"glyph_id": {
"weight": 0.95,
"lineage_score": 0.82,
"contributor_score": 0.89,
"frequency_score": 0.76,
"grammar_score": 0.88
},
...
}
```
#### get_dominant_glyphs()
```python
def get_dominant_glyphs(
pipeline_result: "SymbolicPipelineResult",
n: int = 3,
) List[tuple[str, float]]
```
**Behavior**: Returns top N glyphs ranked by weight.
**Returns**: `[("glyph://compression_theory", 0.95), ("glyph://entropy", 0.73), ...]`
#### format_glyph_resonance_report()
```python
def format_glyph_resonance_report(
pipeline_result: "SymbolicPipelineResult",
) str
```
**Behavior**: Generates human-readable resonance report.
**Output**:
```
Global Resonance Score: 0.847
Glyphs Engaged: 3
Top Glyphs by Weight:
glyph://compression_theory: weight=0.950, lineage=0.820, contributor=0.890
glyph://entropy: weight=0.730, lineage=0.680, contributor=0.710
...
```
---
## Phase 3: Enhanced CALL_GLYPH Operation
### File: `xic_ops.py`
#### op_CALL_GLYPH Update
```python
def op_CALL_GLYPH(ctx: XICContext, *args):
glyph_id = str(args[0])
payload = str(args[1]) if len(args) > 1 else ""
# Route through symbolic pipeline
pipeline_result = run_symbolic_pipeline(...)
# Extract resonance metrics
resonance_metrics = extract_glyph_resonances(pipeline_result)
global_resonance = pipeline_result.fused_symbol.resonance_map.global_resonance_score
# Store comprehensive result
ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}"] = {
"output_text": pipeline_result.output_text,
"fused_symbol": {
"summary": pipeline_result.fused_symbol.summary,
"glyph_ids": pipeline_result.fused_symbol.glyph_ids,
} if pipeline_result.fused_symbol else None,
"resonance_metrics": resonance_metrics,
"global_resonance_score": global_resonance,
"steps": [step metadata...],
}
# Also store full pipeline result for direct access
ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}_pipeline_result"] = pipeline_result
```
**Stored Result Structure**:
```python
ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}"] = {
"output_text": str,
"fused_symbol": {
"summary": str,
"glyph_ids": List[str]
} | None,
"resonance_metrics": Dict[str, Dict[str, float]],
"global_resonance_score": float,
"steps": List[Dict],
}
```
---
## Phase 4: New GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE Instruction
### File: `xic_ops.py`
#### Instruction Signature
```json
{ "op": "GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE", "args": ["<glyph_id>", "<metric>"] }
```
#### Metrics
| Metric | Output | Use Case |
|--------|--------|----------|
| `<none>` / `"report"` | Formatted report | Overview of all resonance data |
| `"global"` | Single float | Overall fusion quality |
| `"dominant"` | Top 5 glyphs | Most important engaged glyphs |
| `"weight"` | Float for glyph_id | Relative importance |
| `"lineage"` | Float for glyph_id | Symbolic ancestry score |
| `"contributor"` | Float for glyph_id | Contribution to fusion |
| `"frequency"` | Float for glyph_id | Occurrence frequency |
| `"grammar"` | Float for glyph_id | Structural alignment |
#### Behavior
1. Looks up stored glyph data: `ctx._state[f"glyph_{glyph_id}"]`
2. If pipeline result available: uses full data (preferred)
3. Otherwise: uses stored resonance_metrics dict (fallback)
4. Prints formatted output with `[XIC-RESONANCE]` prefix
5. Stores result in `ctx._state[f"resonance_query_{glyph_id}_{metric}"]`
#### Example Outputs
**Report (no metric)**:
```
[XIC-RESONANCE] Report for glyph://compression_theory:
Global Resonance Score: 0.847
Glyphs Engaged: 3
Top Glyphs by Weight:
glyph://compression_theory: weight=0.950, lineage=0.820, contributor=0.890
glyph://entropy: weight=0.730, lineage=0.680, contributor=0.710
glyph://coding: weight=0.652, lineage=0.590, contributor=0.645
```
**Global Score**:
```
[XIC-RESONANCE] Global resonance for glyph://compression_theory: 0.847
```
**Dominant Glyphs**:
```
[XIC-RESONANCE] Dominant glyphs for glyph://compression_theory:
glyph://compression_theory: 0.950
glyph://entropy: 0.730
glyph://coding: 0.652
glyph://information: 0.515
glyph://language: 0.487
```
**Specific Metric**:
```
[XIC-RESONANCE] weight for glyph://compression_theory: 0.950
[XIC-RESONANCE] lineage for glyph://compression_theory: 0.820
```
---
## Demo Program
### File: `programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json`
Comprehensive two-chain demo showcasing:
1. **Chain 1 (resonance_analysis_1)**
- CALL_GLYPH with compression_theory
- Query: report (formatted overview)
- Query: global (single score)
- Query: dominant (top 5 glyphs)
- Query: weight (specific metric)
2. **Chain 2 (resonance_analysis_2)**
- CALL_GLYPH with neural_dynamics
- Query: report
- Query: lineage, contributor, frequency, grammar (individual metrics)
All queries logged with CHAIN markers for instrumentation.
---
## Updated Formal Specification
### File: `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md`
#### Additions
1. **Glyph Resonance Structure Section**
- FusedSymbol dataclass definition
- GlyphResonanceMap with methods
- GlyphResonanceMetrics field documentation
- Example JSON structure
2. **GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE Instruction Semantics**
- Signature, preconditions, postconditions
- Metric table with descriptions
- Behavior specification
- Side effects and remarks
#### Documentation
Clear path for accessing resonance data:
```
CALL_GLYPH "glyph_id" "payload"
ctx._state["glyph_glyph_id"] (resonance_metrics + global_resonance_score)
ctx._state["glyph_glyph_id_pipeline_result"] (full SymbolicPipelineResult)
GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE "glyph_id" "metric" (query and display)
```
---
## Exports and Integration
### File: `glyphos/__init__.py`
Added exports:
- `GlyphResonanceMetrics`
- `GlyphResonanceMap`
- `extract_glyph_resonances`
- `get_dominant_glyphs`
- `format_glyph_resonance_report`
All resonance utilities available via:
```python
from glyphos import (
extract_glyph_resonances,
get_dominant_glyphs,
format_glyph_resonance_report,
GlyphResonanceMetrics,
GlyphResonanceMap,
)
```
---
## Architecture
### Module Hierarchy
```
glyphos/
├── cognitive_kernel.py (CognitiveKernel, get_kernel, run_symbolic_prompt)
├── symbolic_pipeline.py (SymbolicPipeline, resonance utilities)
│ ├── SymbolicStep
│ ├── SymbolicPipelineResult
│ ├── FusedSymbol
│ ├── GlyphResonanceMetrics [NEW]
│ ├── GlyphResonanceMap [NEW]
│ ├── run_symbolic_pipeline
│ ├── extract_glyph_resonances [NEW]
│ ├── get_dominant_glyphs [NEW]
│ └── format_glyph_resonance_report [NEW]
├── events.py (EventBus, emit, on)
└── __init__.py (exports all)
xic_ops.py
├── op_LOAD_MODEL
├── op_SET_MODE
├── op_SET_PARAM
├── op_SET_CONTEXT
├── op_RUN_PROMPT
├── op_STREAM
├── op_CHAIN
├── op_CALL_GLYPH [ENHANCED]
├── op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE [NEW]
├── op_LOG
└── OP_TABLE [10 ops]
```
### Data Flow (Resonance-Aware)
```
CALL_GLYPH "glyph_id" "payload"
run_symbolic_pipeline(payload, context, glyph_id)
[Compress → Manifest → LAIN cognition]
SymbolicPipelineResult
├─ steps: [SymbolicStep...]
├─ output_text: str
└─ fused_symbol: FusedSymbol
├─ summary: str
├─ glyph_ids: [str]
└─ resonance_map: GlyphResonanceMap
├─ global_resonance_score: float
└─ resonances: {glyph_id → GlyphResonanceMetrics}
Store in ctx._state:
├─ glyph_{glyph_id}: {output_text, fused_symbol, resonance_metrics, global_resonance_score, steps}
└─ glyph_{glyph_id}_pipeline_result: SymbolicPipelineResult
GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE "glyph_id" "metric"
Query + Display → ctx._state["resonance_query_{glyph_id}_{metric}"]
```
---
## Validation Tests
### Test Coverage (10 tests)
**Test 1: GlyphResonanceMetrics Creation**
- Instantiate with all fields
- Verify all fields accessible
**Test 2: GlyphResonanceMap Methods**
- `get_glyph_resonance()` retrieval
- `get_top_glyphs()` sorting
- `get_average_resonance()` calculation
**Test 3: FusedSymbol from_lain_result()**
- Parse LAIN output structure
- Verify resonance_map populated
- Check glyph_ids list
**Test 4: extract_glyph_resonances()**
- Extract metrics from SymbolicPipelineResult
- Verify dict structure
- Check metric values
**Test 5: get_dominant_glyphs()**
- Rank glyphs by weight
- Return top N correctly
- Verify sorting order
**Test 6: format_glyph_resonance_report()**
- Generate human-readable output
- Include global score
- List top glyphs
**Test 7: op_CALL_GLYPH Storage**
- Execute CALL_GLYPH
- Verify ctx._state["glyph_*"] populated
- Check resonance_metrics structure
**Test 8: op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE Query (report)**
- Query with no metric
- Verify formatted output
- Check ctx._state storage
**Test 9: op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE Query (metrics)**
- Query global, weight, lineage, contributor, frequency, grammar
- Verify each metric extracted
- Check stored values
**Test 10: demo_glyph_resonance Program**
- Execute full demo program
- Verify all instructions execute
- Check both chains complete
- Verify resonance queries all succeed
---
## Backward Compatibility
**XIC v1 programs work unchanged**:
- All existing ops maintain same signatures
- Compressed mode execution path unaffected
- demo_chat.gx.json still works
**XIC v1.5 programs work unchanged**:
- RUN_PROMPT, STREAM, CALL_GLYPH behavior preserved
- run_symbolic_pipeline() signature unchanged
- SymbolicPipelineResult structure preserved
**New features are additive**:
- GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE is new op, doesn't affect existing ones
- Enhanced CALL_GLYPH stores additional data but doesn't change output behavior
- Enhanced data structures don't break existing access patterns
---
## Key Design Decisions
### 1. Multi-Dimensional Resonance Metrics
**Decision**: Five separate metrics (weight, lineage, contributor, frequency, grammar) instead of single resonance score.
**Rationale**: Enables nuanced understanding of glyph engagement. Each dimension captures different aspect of cognitive activity.
### 2. FusedSymbol.from_lain_result() Class Method
**Decision**: Parse LAIN output via class method instead of constructor.
**Rationale**: Allows flexible LAIN output structure. Keeps constructor simple for manual creation.
### 3. GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE as Separate Instruction
**Decision**: New instruction instead of extending CALL_GLYPH.
**Rationale**: Separates concerns (execution vs. introspection). Enables flexible post-execution queries. Supports programmatic access to metrics.
### 4. Store Full SymbolicPipelineResult
**Decision**: Keep full pipeline object in ctx._state alongside extracted metrics.
**Rationale**: Enables direct access to complete data for power users. Supports future introspection capabilities.
---
## Files Modified or Created
### Created
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json` | Demo of glyph resonance metric queries |
| `XIC_GLYPH_RESONANCE_REPORT.md` | This comprehensive report |
### Modified
| File | Changes |
|------|---------|
| `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py` | +GlyphResonanceMetrics, +GlyphResonanceMap, +FusedSymbol.from_lain_result(), +extract_glyph_resonances, +get_dominant_glyphs, +format_glyph_resonance_report |
| `xic_ops.py` | Enhanced op_CALL_GLYPH, +op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE, +OP_TABLE entry |
| `glyphos/__init__.py` | +exports for resonance utilities and dataclasses |
| `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md` | +Glyph Resonance Structure section, +GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE instruction semantics |
### Unchanged (Backward Compatibility)
- xic_loader.py
- xic_vm.py
- xic_executor.py
- runtime_executor/runner.py
- glyphos/cognitive_kernel.py (unchanged signature)
- All existing .gx files
---
## Usage Examples
### Example 1: Query Resonance Report
```bash
glyph --xic programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json
```
Output includes formatted reports for multiple glyphs with all metrics.
### Example 2: Programmatic Access
```python
from xic_executor import run_xic
ctx = run_xic("programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json")
# Access resonance query results
report = ctx._state.get("resonance_query_glyph://compression_theory_report")
global_score = ctx._state.get("resonance_query_glyph://compression_theory_global")
dominant = ctx._state.get("resonance_query_glyph://compression_theory_dominant")
```
### Example 3: Direct Pipeline Result Access
```python
from xic_executor import run_xic
ctx = run_xic("programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json")
# Get full pipeline result
pipeline_result = ctx._state.get("glyph_glyph://compression_theory_pipeline_result")
fused_symbol = pipeline_result.fused_symbol
# Query resonance map
top_glyphs = fused_symbol.resonance_map.get_top_glyphs(n=10)
avg_resonance = fused_symbol.resonance_map.get_average_resonance()
```
---
## Testing
All validation tests pass:
```
[TEST 1] GlyphResonanceMetrics creation ✅
[TEST 2] GlyphResonanceMap methods ✅
[TEST 3] FusedSymbol from_lain_result() ✅
[TEST 4] extract_glyph_resonances() ✅
[TEST 5] get_dominant_glyphs() ✅
[TEST 6] format_glyph_resonance_report() ✅
[TEST 7] op_CALL_GLYPH storage ✅
[TEST 8] op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE report ✅
[TEST 9] op_GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE metrics ✅
[TEST 10] demo_glyph_resonance program ✅
```
---
## References
- **Formal Specification**: See `XIC_SEMANTICS_v1_5.md` for complete instruction semantics
- **Previous Reports**:
- `XIC_SYMBOLIC_EXTENSION_REPORT.md` (v1 symbolic mode)
- `XIC_SYMBOLIC_PIPELINE_REPORT.md` (v1.5 pipeline abstraction)
- **Implementation**: `glyphos/symbolic_pipeline.py`, `xic_ops.py`, `glyphos/__init__.py`
- **Demo**: `programs/demo_glyph_resonance.gx.json`
---
## Summary
XIC v1.5 glyph resonance awareness upgrade provides:
- **Enhanced Data Structures**: GlyphResonanceMetrics with 5-dimensional resonance scoring
- **Utility Functions**: Extract, rank, and report on glyph resonance metrics
- **Query Capability**: GET_GLYPH_RESONANCE instruction with flexible metric selection
- **Full Introspection**: Access complete SymbolicPipelineResult for power users
- **Comprehensive Documentation**: Updated formal semantics with examples
- **Demo Program**: Multi-chain example showcasing all resonance query types
**No breaking changes**. All XIC v1 and v1.5 programs continue to work unchanged.
---
**Implementation Complete**
**All tests passing**
**Backward compatible**
**Formal semantics documented**
**Resonance awareness enabled**